Reconstructing Ramses II

Selection of Source Material

Selection of primary sources for reconstructing the face of Ramesses II drew exclusively from his authentic contemporary portraiture. This included colossal statues such as those at Abu Simbel, the colossal bust in the British Museum, and smaller but consistently detailed representations in temples and monumental reliefs. Painted depictions from his reign were also considered, particularly those preserving the reddish-brown skin tone associated with royal figures of the 19th Dynasty.

These artefacts showed a remarkable consistency in their depiction of the king’s facial structure, including the shape of his eyes, nasal bridge, mouth, cheekbones, and jawline. The positioning, proportions, and stylistic execution across these works demonstrated a strong adherence to a real, recognisable physiognomy, making them reliable for direct use in reconstruction.

Restoration of Damaged Artefacts

The mummy of Ramesses II is not a reference artefact and cannot be treated as a primary source for reconstructing his appearance. Mummification causes distortion and disproportion of soft tissue, making the preserved face no more representative of the living pharaoh than a modern mummy would resemble a photograph of the living person.

However, the mummy has been the subject of repeated Eurocentric reconstructions that portray Ramesses II with a crooked, elongated, hooked nose. None of his authentic contemporary portraiture supports this feature. The purpose of addressing the mummy’s damaged nose in this study was not to reconstruct the pharaoh’s face from it, but to debunk the hooked nose caricatures that pass for reconstruction in order to demonstrate that such Eurocentric portrayals are inaccurate.

CT scan evidence confirms that during embalming, the nasal bridge was deliberately broken in the process of transnasal craniotomy. The cavity was packed with plant seeds, resin, and small bone fragments to prevent collapse, resulting in a post-mortem shape never seen in life.

Actual artefacts from Ramesses II’s reign consistently depict a strong nasal bridge with a rounded tip, never hooked. The colossal bust in the British Museum and statues at Abu Simbel provide clear examples of the correct nasal profile. These portraits confirm the rounded tip and solid bridge, disproving reconstructions derived from the mummy’s damaged state.

Phenotype Analysis

A collage showcasing four profile images of individuals alongside ancient Egyptian reliefs and sculptures, highlighting similarities in facial features.

The facial structure of Ramesses II as seen in his authentic portraiture aligns closely with living African phenotypes. Comparisons were made to individuals and ethnic groups whose physiognomy matches the king’s depicted features, reinforcing the reconstruction’s accuracy.

Prominent examples included rulers of Buganda such as King Mutesa I and King Mutesa II. The latter’s nose bridge, cheekbones, eye shape, and triangular facial taper bear strong similarity to Ramesses II’s statues. Additional parallels were drawn to Afar populations and certain East African individuals whose features correspond with the pharaoh’s portraiture.


Profile portrait of a woman with short hair styled in a traditional manner, adorned with beads. She is wearing large, ornate earrings and has a serious expression. The image captures her ethnic features and cultural attire.
Photograph identified as a Zulu lady

These living examples illustrate that the facial traits portrayed in Ramesses II’s time — broad yet defined nasal bridge, rounded nose tip, high cheekbones, and full cheeks — remain present among African populations today.

Overlay Technique

A comparison image featuring a young African man on the left, a digital reconstruction of Ramesses II in the center, and a statue of Ramesses II on the right, showcasing the alignment of facial features.
Close-up of a colossal statue of Ramesses II, showcasing his distinct facial features, including a strong nasal bridge, rounded tip of the nose, high cheekbones, and full cheeks.
Overlay transition between primary portraiture and reconstruction

The reconstruction employed precise photographic overlays of statues and reliefs to ensure accurate proportions. Straight-on, distortion-free photographs of primary portraiture were aligned to match anatomical landmarks, including eye sockets, nasal bridge, mouth, and jawline.
This process ensured that the contours and proportions of the king’s face were preserved exactly as in his own era’s depictions. AI rendering tools were used only to flesh out realistic textures and lifelike lighting, with all structural information coming from the overlays of primary sources.
Comparison overlays between the reconstruction and the colossal bust in the British Museum demonstrated near-perfect alignment, confirming that the model adhered strictly to the original ancient portraits.

Historical and Anthropological Context

Ramesses II reigned during Egypt’s 19th Dynasty, a period marked by strong cultural and biological connections with the Nile Valley and East African populations. His monuments, including those at Abu Simbel, were not only political and religious symbols but also consistent visual records of his appearance.

The relocation of the Abu Simbel temples during the construction of the Aswan High Dam was a landmark moment in modern archaeology. The colossal statues of the seated king from this site remain among the clearest and most monumental portrayals of his likeness.

Broader historical considerations included the long-standing African identity of the Nile Valley royal lineage and the selective publication of DNA results for pharaonic mummies. The lack of released genetic data for Ramesses II, in contrast to selective publication for other royals, has been seen as intentional avoidance of confirming African affinities.

Iterative Refinement

Portrait of an individual with a smooth complexion, wearing a necklace of colorful beads, showcasing high cheekbones and dark eyes, presented against a dark background.
First iteration of Ramses II.

The reconstruction process produced multiple age-stage versions of Ramesses II, including youthful, middle-aged, and elderly models. Youthful and middle-aged versions were developed directly from the primary contemporary portraiture using the overlay technique. The elderly version was created by applying ageing algorithms from specialist software to the younger reconstruction, with proportional accuracy preserved throughout. This aged model was validated by confirming that broad anatomical landmarks — including orbital placement, nasal bridge axis, and jaw proportions — aligned with the mummy’s structure. The alignment served only to confirm proportional consistency between the reconstruction and the skeletal framework.

Side-by-side comparison of the mummy of Ramesses II and a reconstruction depicting his possible appearance as a living pharaoh.
Elderly Ramses II and his desiccated mummy

Final Presentation

Ramses II smiles again

The completed reconstruction presented Ramesses II with the facial features consistently shown in his own time: a strong nasal bridge with a rounded tip, high cheekbones, full cheeks, slightly bulbous eyes, and a triangular taper from eyes to chin. Skin tone was rendered as the reddish-brown seen in contemporary painted depictions, and hair was shown as wiry and white in the elderly iteration, consistent with African hair texture at advanced age, with some versions featuring subtle henna-red tinting.

Placed alongside statues, colossal busts, and reliefs, the reconstruction matched the ancient portraits precisely. The work countered Eurocentric portrayals by restoring the authentic African phenotype preserved in Ramesses II’s own monuments.


Discover more from The King's Monologue

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

<0.1%

OF OUR READERS FUND OUR WORK. HONESTLY.

Everyone reads it. Almost no one supports it.

We have no rich backers, but we tell the story the mainstream media hides, and make it free.

Or… Support TKM Education with a donation

Responses

  1. Gary Varga avatar

    While the pharaohs were definitely not white, they were also definitely not black, you change a misconception – probably deriving from the fact that the entire Ptolemaic dynasty was greek AKA south European, which includes Cleopatra as well – with a straight up lie. There was a black dynasty, which is pretty sure, but they were clearly – as the sources proove – of Nubian origin

    1. Andrew A. King avatar

      I think you have a knowledge issue. First of all, no one is making any kind of claim that the Ptolemaic Dynasty were black. As you correct asserted, Kemet had numerous foreign dynasties, beginning with the first intermediary, then the Hyksos, the Persians, the aforementioned Nubians, the late period ‘hodge podge’ of semi asiatic rulers, and then finally the Hellenistic rulers (Ptolemaic and Roman). Everyone is aware that they existed, and their ethnicity certainly reflected the ethnographics of their geolocation at the time. Also, yes, the Nubians were a native African Dynasty, as was every Pre dynastic, Old, Middle and New Kingdom lineage – both are entirely indigenous and entirely African. I think that’s the point you are missing, and hence applying an anachronistic lens of a substantially more Afrocentric people. Egyptians having black enemies/conquerors for a period of time during it’s history doesn’t disqualify them from belonging to the same ethno-soci-cultural group as that said group. This is not unique, but rather an incredibly common phenomena, which are witnessing even in modern times with the Russia/Ukraine conflict. It is actually a minority of wars historically that are thought on a binary racial vertical. Most conflicts involve people of similar ethnicity reaching a political disagreement. Hope that helps.

    2. David avatar

      Hair section, mélanine level, skeleton measure, skull measure, languge comparaison, diseace like malaria, DNA and STR, cultural link, iconographie and historiographie proove KEMET was strictly a black african civilisation with no add mixture compose exclusiely of negro african people.
      Nothing can sustain the levantine version.
      Ego of people from lower egypt will not change fact!
      Ptolemaic era is the end of KEMET so yes invaders come like in the fayum

      1. Gary avatar

        Oh my god, it doesn’t even make sense to explain history to these biased people, you guys are just ignorant beyond comprehension. Well, carry on lying, no actual academics believe anything you guys are trying to prove – I’m a student of archaeology, I trust my professors a little more than some random racists on the internet.

      2. Ibinabo Kennedy Willie avatar

        Since when does your archeology professor do historical or forensic reconstruction? The shameless lies people like you tell can have people who know you deny ever knowing you

      3. Gary avatar

        There is no need for them to complete it. It might seem strange to you, but at an academic level, one is capable of reading the works and research of official, university-educated researchers—those that hold international credibility. Don’t even try to diminish my professors with your online degree, if you even have one. The only lie here comes from the editor of this page, who possesses no competent qualifications whatsoever, just like you. Well, you might be even more uneducated and racist than them, which in itself is quite an achievement. Egypt was not black. There were black people, but only as a minority, and aside from one single dynasty, they did not provide pharaohs to Egypt either. Today’s Egyptian population is 60-70% genetically identical to the ancient Egyptians—based on DNA comparisons with mummies. ‘Kemet’ (black) referred to the fertile soil caused by the flooding of the Nile, just as the term ‘Keshret’ (red) referred to the sandy, infertile areas and their inhabitants. Please do not humiliate yourself this much on the internet; it is quite enough that your family and ‘friends’ know you are stupid

    3. David avatar

      you have cultural evidence or something else than those DNA?

      will you loose something if Kemet is not a pale face civilisation?

  2. David avatar

    Carole choose the color at 35′ and call it science to please the arab republique of egypt ego https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qydmdwlkt9A

  3. David avatar

    Ramses II skull can be see at 23′ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qydmdwlkt9A

Leave a Reply

<0.1%

OF OUR READERS FUND OUR WORK. HONESTLY.

Everyone reads it. Almost no one supports it.

We have no rich backers, but we tell the story the mainstream media hides, and make it free.

Or better yet, support us from just 86p a week.

Continue reading