The African signature hidden in Hieroglyphs

Introduction

The hieroglyph for “face” in the Medu Neter (hieroglyphic script) is simplistic yet profoundly expressive. It serves not only as a linguistic symbol but also as an important cultural marker. The precision involved in creating hieroglyphs suggests that each character was deliberately chosen to reflect the civilisation’s environment, beliefs, and self-perception.

The Craft of Hieroglyphs

Engraving Hieroglyphic engravings, ranging from 2 mm to 1 inch in depth, required meticulous craftsmanship. Unlike later scripts such as the demotic shorthand, hieroglyphs remained largely unchanged for over 3,000 years. Errors in engraving could mean scrapping and restarting entire stelae, emphasising the seriousness with which this script was regarded. The hieroglyphic system was not merely a method of communication but a visual language carefully curated to reflect the surrounding world.

Cultural Clues in Flora and Fauna of Heiroglyphs

Hieroglyphs were more than linguistic symbols; they were reflections of the culture and environment in which they were developed. Several examples demonstrate this:

  • The Spotted Eagle Owl (Bubo africanus) – Representing the phonetic sound “M,” this bird is native to South Africa.
  • The Cape Vulture (Gyps coprotheres) – Used for “Muut,” a reference to death, this species is endemic to Southern Africa.
  • The Crocodile and Blue Lotus Flower – Symbols reflecting the abundant flora and fauna along the Nile Valley.
  • The Ostrich Feather – Representing Ma’at (truth and balance), this glyph reflects the presence of the world’s largest bird in Africa.
  • The Baboon – Chosen to represent “R” and “L,” this species is found almost exclusively in Africa.
  • The Cobra – A widespread serpent in Southern Africa, chosen to represent the word “goddess.”
  • The Sacred African Ibis – Representing Tehuti (Thoth, the god of wisdom), this bird is indigenous to Southern Africa.

Every plant and animal depicted in the Medu Neter was native to Africa, particularly the southern regions. This suggests that the language originated from an African context rather than an external influence.

The Face Hieroglyph and it’s perception as a shared identity

The hieroglyph for “face” (which bears the phonetic value ‘hr’ in the Ancient Egyptian language) often represents the second-person pronoun (“him” or “her”) and serves as a general depiction of the people who created the language. Despite exposure to a broad spectrum of phenotypes, the Egyptians selected a facial representation that aligned with their dominant features at the time of the script’s development. The characteristics of the face glyph—short, tightly curled hair, a broad nose, and full lips—closely resemble modern Southern and Central African populations. In contrast, other facial depictions that resemble Levantine or European populations were not chosen, further reinforcing the African identity of the ancient Egyptians.

Historical Accounts Supporting the African Origin of Hieroglyphs

Several historical scholars and historians have acknowledged the African roots of the Nile Valley civilisations.

  • E.A. Wallis Budge, a leading translator of Kemetic hieroglyphs, asserted that the religious beliefs of the Nile Valley were of indigenous African origin. He stated: “There is no doubt that the beliefs examined herein are of indigenous origin, Nilotic or Sûdânî in the broadest signification of the word… In the religions of modern African peoples, we find that the beliefs underlying them are almost identical with those of Ancient Egyptians.”

E. A. Wallis Budge

  • Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historian and contemporary of ancient Egyptian culture, recorded: “They say also that the Egyptians are colonists sent out by the Ethiopians (Africans), […] And the larger part of the customs of the Egyptians are, they hold, Ethiopian, the colonists still preserving their ancient manners. For instance, the belief that their kings are gods, the very special attention which they pay to their burials, and many other matters of a similar nature are Ethiopian practices, while the shapes of their statues and the forms of their letters are Ethiopian; for of the two kinds of writing which the Egyptians have, that which is known as “popular” (demotic) is learned by everyone, while that which is called “sacred” (hieroglyphics) is understood only by the priests of the Egyptians, who learn it from their fathers as one of the things which are not divulged, but among the Ethiopians everyone uses these forms of letters.” He clearly noted that the forms of Egyptian writing, including hieroglyphics, were directly linked to Ethiopian (African) practices.

Diodorus Siculus

Conclusion

The Indisputable African Origins of Hieroglyphs

A close examination of hieroglyphs reveals an unmistakable connection to continental Africa. The Medu Neter combines flora, fauna, religious symbols, and anthropological representations. This combination strongly supports the idea that this script developed within Africa’s interior. It is unlikely that it came from an external culture. Despite modern debates that attempt to disconnect Kemet (ancient Egypt) from its African heritage, the hieroglyphic script provides invaluable insights. The face glyph, in particular, serves as a powerful testament to its true origins.


Discover more from The King's Monologue

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Support TKM Education on a monthly basis

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The King's Monologue

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from The King's Monologue

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading